The government is at war with the Constitution and the rule of law.
Where’s the cartel when you need em!?
Is there a good argument for why any society not in collapse should submit to any “higher” authority?
I’m just waiting for the west coast to break off and do it’s own thing
The biggest national security threats are Trump, the Heritage Foundation, MAGA, and Musk
Not only to the nation, The entire world, Humanity, literally anything that is alive.
Hey don’t trow indigenous groups, animals, fungi and plants it to this.
The problem seems to be specifically people that live with computers.
As everyone should be.
You know what? Yeah. GFY trump.
The country was in peril; he was jeopardizing his traditional rights of freedom and independence by daring to exercise them.
- Catch-22, Joseph Heller
Based
Welcome to the rebellion.
I’m in.
Sounds like bro wants to start the plot to the movie civil war.
Is that worth watching?
It wasn’t when it came out. It is now.
Watch the korean film A Taxi Driver instead.
Its less about the war and more about journalism and the limits of the human capacity for violence over time. IMO excellent film, amazing performance from Kirsten Dunst
Yeah it is. The whole film is worth watching for about 4 key scenes, and the last 15 minutes are very satisfying.
“Mr President, i still need a quote.”
“Don’t let them kill me…!”
“That’ll do.”
BANG
I thought so. Don’t go in with expectations. Enjoy the ride.
That should really be the rule for all movies.
it sucks.
Here we go. Buckle up and arm yourselves.
ELI5, If Republicans in general don’t want federal control, they want de-regulation, then why they are supporting federal control of California?
They want to use the government to attack their enemies.
Like a switch, as soon as a Democrat is in office they will all be lying about wanting “small government.”
They are only against federal control when it’s them who are being controlled. They are fine with it happening to other people. It’s how they can claim to be pro freedom out of one side of their mouth and anti-freedom with the other. Laws for thee, none for me.
This is extremely important to understand. As fun as it is, we really need to move away from the gotchas. The right wing are not consistent because they do not have an ideology. They are simply reactionary.
They’re lying about that first part
They want small opposition, and they like to deregulate themselves.
The Confederacy was in a state of rebellion too. He’s equated standing up to ICE, which is seemingly similar to when the Bostonians stood up to and were massacred by the British, with the Confederate’s bombing of Ft. Sumter.
So the trump administration is fully admitting that the insurrection attempting to block the certification of the Presidential election 2021 on Jan 6 was open rebellion?
Holly shit. I hadn’t seen that last image you posted before. I didn’t realize the Jan 6 insurrectionist brought flexcuffs. That is quite disturbing. Who the fuck were they planing to kidnap or take hostage with those flexcuffs?
Nancy Pelosi, AOC, Mike Pence, and really anyone who they deemed to have offended their god-emperor and who happened to still be in the building.
They were probably associated with the ones that built the gallows outside on the lawn. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jan-6-gallows-construction-new-video/
I know this is sarcasm but, sadly, they don’t. I have talked to a few of them. Some either say it is patriot8c and others said it didn’t happen.
You can’t win
others said it didn’t happen.
Who is it they acknowledge trump pardoned when he got into office? If it didn’t happen, then there as no one to pardon. Yet trump came out and gleefully pardoned the lot of them. If it was “antifa” that did it, why did trump pardon antifa?
Keep in mind I’m not questioning you on this but them, and I know the mind of a MAGAt is finely tuned to support cognitive dissonance.
He was just correcting a witch hunt of patriots sightseeing by the former administration./s
They admit no such thing.
“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” - Frank Wilhoit (not the political scientist who passed away in 2010, a younger one who is alive still).
