For my birthday, my spouse got me a nicer newer expensive version of a thing I already have. The one I have is older and dented but works just fine. I use it weekly. I never complain about it. I’ve never asked for a newer one. The one I have was given to me by my mother in law, whom I adore. It’s sentimental.

I don’t like new things. When they got me a 3d printer, it was the cheapest one and it was a kit and I had to build myself. I loved it. It’s perfect for me. I regularly buy things used or get things from Buy Nothing groups. I much prefer to repair old things in many ways. My car has over 100k miles. The one before did too. I don’t like new things.

We got into a huge argument because I want to return it. They are so upset with me that they left the house to calm down. Why am I the bad person? Why are they mad at me? I have a very clear tendency for old broken used things. Why am I obligated to like this new thing?

We literally established a rule early in our marriage. I’m not allowed to gift nerdy t shirts. They don’t like them. I love them. I thought they would like them but they do not. So they asked me to stop. This feels the same. I do not like new things. Why am I the bad guy for wanting to return the newer version of the thing I already have?

  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    You may be autistic and should get properly diagnosed. I am not joking. Your spouse was trying to do a nice thing for you and maybe even liked the idea of you using something they got you all the time the way you use your current one. Given how you form emotional attachments to old and familiar things and given how you don’t understand your spouse’s hurt, you are very likely on spectrum. Being diagnosed will help give you the tools to better interact with others, and will help those close to you — like your spouse — know how to relate to you more effectively.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        In that case, here’s a plausable explanation that might resonate:

        Gifts are a social contract. They are tendering their time, effort, and feelings for you to pick something to make you happy. If they misjudge you and you care about their happiness, thank them, hug them, make them feel special, then make sure you have a gift list available to them next time. This could be a Pinterest board, or anything. Focus on things you’d consider acceptable, even though they’re new. Also, DON’T GIVE THEM THAT LIST RIGHT NOW. In fact, wait until black Friday and tell them you have trouble picking out gifts for them, and ask if they could make a list, and can then, hopefully, safely exchange lists.

        Your spouse put a lot of time and strong feelings into picking you birthday a gift. They formed an emotional attachment to this process/gift expecting to make you happy. Perhaps they feel like they don’t get you good gifts, perhaps the price of the item itself was a hardship that they decided to bear on your behalf to make them feel proud, or maybe they feel like you’re too good at getting them gifts. Perhaps you’re extremely hard to shop for since finding you used, repairable items that you’ll appreciate is an insurmountably difficult task from the outside. In any case, they felt that they had done a good job and probably had a solid sigh of relief for figuring something out.

        They wrap it, feeling excitement, wanting you to be happy. They hand it over to you. You appear disappointed and want to return it. Even if you put on a good face at the time and later mentioned returning it, All that excitement, pride, and serotonin they had is now instantly gone. They feel awful for not understanding you.

        Embarrasment + Shame + Sadness will make some awful anger.

        Pick your battles. Someone giving you something nice that you don’t love for your own reasons is rarely a battle worth having. Accept it with grace and admiration for them. Make them as happy as they’re trying to make you.

      • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Your post is like something I could have written, right down to repairing old things and loving them because you breathed new life into them, and because they are familiar, reliable, and comforting. Getting diagnosed opens a world of support and understanding, and I cannot encourage you enough to pursue it. Do it for your marriage and your own happiness. Even if it’s not ASD, a diagnosis helps more than you might initially think.

    • obsoleteacct@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah. That was so clear (IMO) that It didn’t even occur to me that this person may not already know that.

    • Leather@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      Unnecessary, uncool. Why try to label someone why you don’t know, and obviously don’t have the credentials to diagnose?

      • Oascany@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I mean they did say “you may be…” and then followed it up with advice to talk to a professional. I don’t think there was an attempt to diagnose here, even though I don’t agree with how the comment was worded. Personally, I think everyone should get tested to see what neuroatypicalities they have.

        • Michael@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Not following the impersonal and casual, episodic/event-based gift-giving culture we have to a T isn’t evidence of disease.

            • Michael@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              BlameTheAntifa: Because I am autistic, have been through this myself, and game recognizes game. These are classic hallmarks of ASD. I appreciate that you care, but OP clearly needs to take the first step and seek a professional diagnosis, which could change their life for the better.

              Strongly suggesting that OP’s behavior fits the “classic hallmarks of ASD”, appealing to their own diagnosis of autism by saying “game recognizes game”, and suggesting that they need to seek professional diagnosis and “take the first step” is basically suggesting that OP’s behavior is diseased.

      • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Because I am autistic, have been through this myself, and game recognizes game. These are classic hallmarks of ASD. I appreciate that you care, but OP clearly needs to take the first step and seek a professional diagnosis, which could change their life for the better.

        • Michael@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          These are classic hallmarks of ASD.

          Care to provide a source for that? Gift-giving and receiving is cultural and people are free to not conform.

          • JackbyDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Just running a web search for “ASD gift disappointment” gives a ton of articles, not necessarily the exact situation OP is in, but it’s enough to say that I think it’s a common thing.

            • Michael@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              It’s not an indicator of autism, full-stop. OP is not having “difficulty” conforming to culture. OP received a gift that didn’t hit the mark - their spouse is free to try again and make it a nice gift. OP can’t stealthily return it and there are likely financial considerations in addition to their personal preference of not wanting new, expensive things that directly replace appliances they are content with.

              • JackbyDev@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                The way you say “potentially diseased” is pretty rude. That’s not how I view folks with ASD. All of this is because someone who has ASD and thought OP was going through something similar. I have ADHD. If I saw someone speaking about one of the pivotal moments that led to me getting a diagnosis I might say to them “have you considered you have ADHD?”

                • Michael@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  The way you say “potentially diseased” is pretty rude.

                  What else does saying somebody’s behavior is abnormal and strongly pushing them to get professionally diagnosed really mean if not “potentially diseased”? I’m somebody who is on the spectrum too and I personally believe that autism is a normal difference, with specific qualities, and that OP’s reaction doesn’t really fit in this instance.

              • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Neurodiversity is not disease and I do not appreciate that implication at all. Please educate yourself on the topic before you embarrass yourself and the rest of us further. This was profoundly ignorant and hurtful.

                • Michael@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I explained my position very clearly below your comment, but I do believe you are pathologizing normal behavior as being diseased or disordered, yes. I provided reasoning both in the comment you chose to respond to and in others. Feel free to understand my position before mischaracterizing it.

      • filcuk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Because this isn’t a regular behavior. Ignoring a potential abnormality will just complicate their life. They didn’t diagnose anyone, please learn to read.

      • Rumo161@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Even thoug the comment wasnt a direct diagnose its still unessecerly labeling. The explained situation could have multiple layers we cant possibly know of.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    (Quick aside, I don’t know all the details, so I use a lot of imprecise language to account for uncertainty.)

    A very common reason that people like old things is that they are trying to be self sacrificial or frugal to save money. I’m not saying that’s why you are, but it’s important to realize. Your wife could very easily see you always doing this as you trying to be nice and save money for the family/pair of you rather than getting yourself something nice. I’m sort of like that. I have a weird aversion to spending money so don’t always get myself nice things.

    Gifts can be given for a lot of different reasons. It’s sort of difficult to quantify why because it’s something emotional. Giving someone a gift card for something can feel better than giving money because it is more specific to their interests, and giving a specific gift is even moreso.

    I think your spouse perhaps sees you every day surrounding yourself with things that they view as old and broken and maybe thinks you’re doing it because you don’t want to spend the money or treat yourself to something nice. So for a gift, they may have thought “for once, my spouse deserves something nice, I want them to have something nice and new.”

    Then, when you say “I don’t like this, I like my old one” it hurts their feelings perhaps because they think you’re saying it’s a bad gift. They may have put a lot of thought into this expensive gift, maybe even thinking long and hard about what aspects about it you may use more. I think you said it’s a kitchen appliance in another comment? So I’ll assume it’s something like that, just to help explain. Say it’s something like a kitchen top mixer. Maybe they thought about the foods you make and the attachments and may have even thought about specific times you struggled with the older one (that despite working fine, maybe doesn’t have features some new ones have). If all of that is true, when you say it’s not a good gift, you could be saying all that thought and effort was incorrect.

    Something frustrating about this is that there isn’t really a right answer. There’s not necessarily an objectively correct answer to whether they should’ve gotten you the gift and whether you were wrong to ask to return it and set a boundary about newer items as gifts. You two are in a relationship. Relationships are about compromise. You brought up the nerdy shirt thing as an example. It could be comparable, but it’s hard to say. If the shirt selection process is something like “my spouse likes superman and there is a superman shirt at the store, I’ll buy it” and their gift selection process is something like “my spouse uses this item nearly every day, this is how they use it, these are the things they struggle with, these are the features they would benefit from having, I’ll get them this one” then no, they aren’t comparable. (But, I don’t know everything, the thought process could’ve just been “let me go to an online store and pick the one with the best reviews” and nothing more.) I don’t wanna make assumptions and apply them, that’s part of why a lot of this is sort of vague and “if if if”, but it could very well be that they didn’t want the shirts in part because they know they won’t wear them and also because they may have thought you weren’t putting a lot of thought into them.

    Every relationship is unique. We have to not only think about how we show love, but also how we’re willing to accept being loved. Gift giving is a love language. This gift may have been a very intimate and genuine expression of love from your spouse. Asking them to return it would hurt their feelings very badly. And it sounds like it did if they had to leave the house.

    How did you feel when you agreed to not buy them nerdy shirts? Was it just sort of like “okay, I can do that” or was it devastating? Thinking about compromising and how we both show love and accept love, it might not be comparable. If nerdy shirts bother them but you not being able to give them doesn’t upset you, then that’s a win, right? No downside. But if you not wanting something new upsets you and it also really upsets your spouse not being able to give them, then it’s complicated. And whether or not you should accept the gift isn’t really the point I’m making in this moment, I’m just trying to help explain why this situation may not be as comparable to the shirt scenario, despite seeming like it is.

    My gut feeling to all of this is that you should just accept gifts. That was how I was raised. Maybe it’s just considered a polite thing because of the culture of where I live (southeast US). But that moment is past. You can’t go back to how you reacted when you opened it so it’s no use talking about. What has happened is that your spouse’s feelings are hurt and you hurt them. It doesn’t matter who is in the right at this moment, what matters is that you hurt them. You need to apologize for hurting their feelings. Try to understand their feelings and apologize for the things you did that hurt them. Don’t provide explanations or defend yourself, because apologies aren’t about who is right and wrong, they’re about who is hurt.

    In general, I think asking someone if you can return their gift is pretty rude. I always try to include a gift receipt in case people want to, but getting told to my face “I returned your gift because I didn’t like it” would be upsetting.

    I definitely think discussing some new boundaries after this are in order. Not necessarily because either of you did anything wrong (because I also want to give you the benefit of the doubt that this gift may have upset you too), but because this situation led to a scenario where both of you got really upset. Maybe a cash limit on gifts? Maybe gifts over that limit you discuss together? “Honey, you always use that old mixer, and you deserve a new one, I want to get you one.” “No, but thank you, I like this because X and Y.” Or, if the surprise aspect is important to your spouse and they really don’t want to ruin it, maybe you can agree on no gifts over a certain price that are replacements for things you already have? And that if she gets it wrong, you still accept the gift maybe? Maybe you both agree to talk about gifts over that price limit prior to purchase?

    Relationships and love can be difficult things. But communication is key. Apologizing is key. Apologize for hurting their feelings without defending your actions or explaining yourself. Once they feel better, talk about what the new boundaries might look like.

  • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 days ago

    I had issues with this, with my partner. They love surprises, and kept trying to learn how to correctly surprise me with a gift.

    The sentence that finally got us on the same page:

    “I can enjoy a surprise. But I enjoy same event, whatever it is, more, if it is not a surprise. I don’t necessarily hate every event that is a surprise. But every surprise is less pleasant to me than the same event wouldd he without the surprise.”

    • Cricket@lemmy.zip@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Edit: And we now have a shared understanding that anything big or expensive or hard to store needs to not be a surprise.

      Wait, so no surprise brand new cars with a giant red bow for Christmas like they show in the commercials? /s

      Seriously though, this is a pretty good rule. I may have to talk to my spouse about doing something similar.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      They do still surprise me, sometimes, but they finally understand that there’s a cost, to me, to it. And now they weigh that into their decision, and it is so nice for me!

      This part is important. I touched in it a little in my comment to OP as well, but it’s easy to forget that a relationship is not only about how you show love, but how you accept it. I’m glad you’re able to accept some surprises and I’m glad your partner has accepted that not everything should be a surprise. It’s a good compromise!

    • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I couldn’t agree more. A cute little toy or gadget? Sure, surprise me. New laptop, car, washing machine, furniture? What the fuck, why would you surprise someone with that, if I’m to use it I want a say in what kind it is and that we didn’t waste money on bullshit. It’s not even that I don’t trust others, just that I feel left out. A simple “hey, the washing machine broke, I found a good one and I think ill buy it” is enough.

  • Rumo161@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    If a gift is given with expectations its not a gift, its a trade you didnt agree to. You have to be able to deny the gift. Maybe you should talk about expectations and preference.

    • GrayBackgroundMusic@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      You’re getting down voted but it honestly feels like this sometimes. I’ve also heard the phrase covert contract. Essentially if you don’t react properly, you’re punished. It’s happened my whole life.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Respectfully, what contract do you think this gift represented? What do you think you’d be getting out of by not accepting it?

        • Michael@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Is OP supposed to lie and act like they enjoy the gift when in reality they don’t for you to see their behavior as normal? What is the expected normal reaction in your mind?

          • JackbyDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I asked what the contract is, not what the reaction should be, or are you saying you’d say the contract is the reaction?

            • Michael@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Forming an emotional, but unspoken attachment to the person receiving the gift enjoying it and gladly accepting it is the covert contract. The punishment is being upset because OP doesn’t want it or like it and them insisting that they keep the gift.

              This is OP’s spouse, not a stranger. They can’t politely accept the gift and hide that they don’t enjoy or want that gift without deception.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    I thought this community was a half sarcastic knockoff of the reddit equivalent sub, didn’t actually expect to see a serious post lol.

  • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    If you made it clear you do not like new things I don’t know why your spouse thought this would be different. And then on top of it to need to leave the house to cool off (which that itself is fine, but feeling so strongly about it isn’t imo) something feels off.

    If I knew my partner didn’t like new stuff, and I got her new stuff anyway, I wouldn’t take it personally and get very upset about it. Did you talk to your spouse about it yet? Clearly there’s a disconnect somewhere but you did nothing wrong by saying you want to return it. Hell, it’s not like you returned it already and used that money to buy something else. Or pretended to like it but return it in secret. You’re being very open and honest and communicative about your feelings which is good.

    Idk, feels like a pretty big overreaction on your spouses part that warrants a conversation.

  • Slayan@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s time for new rules OP, and also a good talk with your S.O. nothing you did is wrong and nothing they did is wrong. It’s more about being open and having discussions. They should know these kind of things, and the fact that they don’t is both your fault.

    No one is suffering here (imo) so that’s a great success.

      • Slayan@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Are you being punished or are you feeling punished. This is a point you should talk about with your s.o

        I’ve been dating the same girl for 16 yrs now and she finally understood how important the word “i am sorry” are to me. Is it her fault? Nah is it mine? I don’t think so, because i’m pretty sure i stated it clearly multiple time. Is there really a need for someone to be at fault?

        Your s.o anger might not be directed toward you, but more toward the situation, which your are part of.

      • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Because we are emotional beings, because nobody is perfect, and because angry people (presumably, both of you) say things they otherwise would not say.

      • Sprinks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        So…i hate to add to it…but my husband is mildly autistic and we’ve had this exact conflict with gift giving early in our marriage.

        He sees the act of gift giving very logically and practically, which is perfectly fine, but i didnt really understand this early on in our relationship. We eventually sat down, talked about how we each felt, and it clicked that we had a disconnect on the social/emotional layer of gift giving. I saw and felt that gift giving was more of an act of showing the other person they crossed your mind; a display of emotion. On the other hand, my husband saw and felt gift giving was more about making sure the item is exactly what the other person wants, including if that item is “nothing”; logical, literal, and practical.

        Sit down together and talk. Use “I” statements, keep calm voices, and dont interrupt. The goal is to express how you feel, listen to how they feel, and work together to help each other understand both perspectives.

          • Sprinks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Ill be honest, i agree that therapy may be needed, here.

            Ive tried this with them. It doesnt work.

            Im not a therapist, so take this with a grain of salt, but this is concerning to hear for me. It gives me the impression you might be closed off to your role in the conflict and the effort your spouse is putting in to understand your side (assuming there is effort to talk in any way). Talking together as a couple isnt a “Im trying”, its a “We’re trying.” “We” coming from the recognition that both sides are trying to understand the other even if resolution hasnt been found yet. Dont approach it as a “talk with them”, theyre not a dependent that needs a lecture, but rather as a “talk together” where both sides are actively heard and recognized regardless of if the other agrees. The goal is to understand the other, not necessarily to make your side heard. Once you both understand the other persons perspective, it becomes easier to find the disconnect or middle ground.

            Declaring “it doesnt work” isnt trying to understand the other, its shutting things down and wont solve anything anytime soon.

      • Jarix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        3 days ago

        They can go fuck themselves if they aren’t going to explain that. Being autistic isn’t a god damned reason for you to be insulted.

        You might be autistic and don’t know it. Any of us might be.

        That person is a piece of shit for testing autism like it’s a slur. And also shitting all over your clear sternly to try to understand this situation.

        I would be pissed if someone did that to me and then makes me out to be some villain because they fucked up on their gift.

        • baggachipz@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 days ago

          I didn’t say it as a slur. The fact that you took it that way says more about you than me. The situation described is textbook autistic behavior.

          • Jarix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            3 days ago

            You didn’t explain it or provide any additional context. You used it exactly as it has been used, word for word, as is used when it’s being used as a slur.

            I was clear to say without an explanation it is a slur.

  • Natanael@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    You have to explain why in a much clearer way.

    Explain that you do appreciate it. Explain that if you hadn’t had the prior thing you probably would have loved it. But now, it’s a change, and it’s a big change, in several ways, including the nostalgia factor, and you absolutely appreciate that this thing is newer and more expensive but it doesn’t YET make sense for you to make the change and because of that you don’t want to make the change.

    And because of that, it will just be sitting unused and you don’t like the idea of it sitting unused.

    It felt bad to you to not use a gift.

    And that, wanting to keep what you have, not wanting a change, and not wanting it to sit unused, is why you suggested a return, and not because you don’t appreciate it.

    I think you’ll have to explain the “not wanting change” bit the most, by explaining why you feel that way. Maybe try finding a similar comparison. Imagine you’d gift them expensive jewelry or clothes they feel they couldn’t ever wear, maybe something they couldn’t wear together with their favorite clothing. A bag that would only sit in a closet. A tool that does more, but is heavier or whatever. Whatever that feels relevant to them, that makes them understand why you feel like you don’t want to make the change, not yet.

    this is brilliant, but I like this

    How should you have initially responded? Hard to say without knowing the people around you, but I’d say it would’ve been safe to say something like “oh, I don’t know if I can replace the current thing yet, I like it too much, and it’s got so many years left”

    In other words, tell her that the gift was indeed great and that there’s wrong with the gift except timing, and emphasize you do not fault her for anything, you’re happy she thought of it, you’re sorry your reaction made her feel bad, you should’ve communicated better, and you’ll make a change to communicate better.

    Perhaps even say something like “I probably should’ve told you I wanted to use this current thing for much longer, I should’ve explained more about how I think about these things and how I plan”. Because your initial response sucked honestly, and you need to make sure your phrasing don’t make her feel she made a mistake.

    If she really likes being able to give you gifts, and if she now feels uncertain about being able to give you future gifts (this is very likely, by the way!), you should consider implementing that “communicating better” thing - for example (you don’t need to do it exactly like this, IT’S AN EXAMPLE) by maintaining and sharing a list of your existing things plus a wishlist, with details like “don’t replace before” and “replace no later than” and “required specs: XYZ”. And if she likes feeling like she can put her own touch on it, DO NOT present it as “do exactly this”, but rather “you can take inspiration from this”.

    • GrayBackgroundMusic@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      oh, I don’t know if I can replace the current thing yet, I like it too much, and it’s got so many years left

      That’s awesome wording.

      This whole comment is amazing. Thank you so much.

  • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    It seems to me it would be very difficult, if not impossible, to shop for someone that refuses any “new” item.

    Also, how many nerdy t-shirts did you gift them before the rule was in place? How did your partner react to all of those t-shirts? Did they immediately demand you return them?

    It is a harsh reaction to request a gift just be returned.

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s also pretty shitty to say that thing you live sucks gets a version I think is better and you HAVE to like it

      • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        That’s a pretty extreme interpretation of being given a gift…

        You aren’t even OP… Are you OK?

        • Jarix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          A hyperbole (pronounced “hy-per-buh-lee”) is a literary device that uses extreme exaggeration to create strong emphasis

          I’m fine, perhaps I went a little too overboard, but it was intended a hyperbole to make clear the point I was arguing from.

          Perhaps I misunderstood this literary device or how to use it, but now you know what I was attempting, I’ll consider an edit if you want to play Editor for a minute

  • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    185
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    One time my wife got me a really nice DeWalt jig saw for Christmas. I already had a jigsaw. It worked well enough for as much as I use it. Although the newer one was better quality and had a few nicer features.

    You know what I did? I thanked her and told her how much I appreciated it. She saw something she thought would make my life a little easier and got it for me as a gift. It was a very kind gesture. If it were the wrong one, I probably would have talked to her later and asked if I could exchange it for one that would have suited my needs better while still letting her know that I appreciated what she was trying to do. I’m sure she would have been fine with that.

    What I wouldn’t have done was gripe at her for buying me a new power tool because I “don’t like new things” or “I already have a jigsaw and it works just fine.” That would be a terrible idea which would understandably hurt her feelings when she was just trying to do something nice for me.

    It wasn’t about the “thing”. It was about the gesture. The fact that they gave you such a gift shows that they pay attention to what you do and they wanted to give you something to make your life a little easier. That was very thoughtful but you threw it back in their face. I completely understand why they’re angry.

    • hydrashok@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      64
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I completely agree and thank you for articulating it better than I. All my draft replies either read as mean-spirited or dismissive.

    • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      So I want to offer an alternative perspective.

      I don’t know if OP is coming at if from the same place as me, but I’m broadly anti-consumerist. I prefer using the thing I have until it doesn’t work anymore. When it doesn’t work anymore, I prefer replacing it with something used when possible. If I get something new, I do a lot of research to find something durable and reliable that will last a long time.

      There’s a moral aspect to it for me. Every new gadget or tchotchy burns in my mind as future trash, as the sum of all the energy and materials to make and fuel to transport and the resultant pollution. I recycle as much as possible, I limit my consumption as much as possible, when I do have things they are generally books or tools to help me otherwise limit my consumption.

      When I get some kitschy thing as a gift, that I don’t need and took resources and generated waste to make, I feel like a vegan being gifted meat. No matter how well-intentioned the giver is, I feel implicated in something that is dirty to me. If you keep telling your family that you’re a vegan, and they keep gifting you meat, any warmth from their intent is dwarfed by the sting that they keep ignoring your wishes.

      A nice gesture that’s focused on the validation of the giver, in clear violation of the stated wishes of the receiver, is not a nice gesture. The nicest A5 Wagyu is not a nice gesture to someone who already told you they’re a vegan.

      • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        4 days ago

        A nice gesture that’s focused on the validation of the giver, in clear violation of the stated wishes of the receiver, is not a nice gesture.

        I think this is the heart of it. Really depends on OPs delivery, but if this was at least communicated, I can’t see how they wouldn’t see where OP was coming from too.

        It’s so hard in this consumerist society to tell people sometimes it’s a better gesture not to wastefully buy things just to say you cared.

        • Nalivai@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          not to wastefully buy things just to say you cared.

          That’s not what people usually do though. For most people new thing brings joy, (that’s why consumerism is a thing in the first place), so people are buying new thing for you to bring you joy.

            • Jarix@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 days ago

              Oh also it doesn’t fucking matter what most people would feel about new things. The gift giver isn’t a stranger. They are married(assuming mother in law comment about the origin of the watch being replaced) and should know by now say least this much about the person they are sharing their life with.

              How could you be this oblivious to who your partner is by saying most people would have appreciated it.

              Using that reasoning then you are testing your spouse no more intimately than a complete stranger. That would hurt most people…

              • Nalivai@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                In requiring this much care for a partner, you need to remember to also give this much care.
                It’s not like they took something from him, it was a gift, a gift of a thing he likes, he just got all pissy about how nobody appreciates his hobo aesthetics. When someone gives you a gift, rub some dirt in your new dildo and say thank you for your partner that cares for you and loves you, don’t be a dick.

      • novibe@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        May I just ask… why? Why this obsession with old and used things? Seems like misplaced concern for the environment/the world.

        Misplaced I say because our individual impact is negligible, and 99,99% of all problems stem from like 10 massive polluting corporations.

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Because some people don’t think it’s misplaced. It’s not an obsession with old things, it’s an avoidance of new ones. Just because I’m only responsible for a tiny fraction doesn’t mean I’m going to ignore that fraction.

          Consumerism is why those massive companies pollute so much in the first place.

          If I may ask, why is everyone else so obsessed with new things? Why is it the people who don’t feel the need to constantly buy new products that have to explain themselves? That seems backwards.

          • novibe@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I feel like it doesn’t have to be so extreme either way y’know. Getting a new better tool while your old one still (kinda) works is not wasteful. What’s wasteful is for cars to be manufactured purposefully to breakdown earlier. For TVs to break right when warranty expires. That’s something that impacts the world INFINITELY more than you holding on with white fingers to some old shit that’s falling apart.

            • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              Right, and buying new stuff when you don’t need it perpetuates all those bad corporate practices. You can want to fix that while also not wanting to personally contribute to the excess.

              You and I have different tolerances for waste. I’m not going to preach to you about it, but you should at least respect the wishes of people who want to help in the ways they can.

      • ApollosArrow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        It think it’s about balance. I have the same view point as yours. Early on, my wife would just get me new things of objects I already had. The difference is timing. I would tell her after the fact to not ruin her mood. She eventually understood and learned.

        Every now and then she still does get me a thing I believe I don’t need. But she’s learned to be observant and is usually correct. If it were up to me, I would likely wear socks until all 5 toes are showing through. What I do in this instance is keep the new thing and I make sure I gift the older item to someone in need of it, or as back up for myself if the space allows. I am very much known in my spaces as the person that gives things away. If you’ve been in my life at least 3yrs, you probably own something that belonged to me.

        I’m not sure what the relationship is between OP and the partner, but timing of when you tell them, does matter. Don’t do it right when the person has given you the gift, just wait. From what info there is, it doesn’t sound like they are a repeat offender of violating their rules.

        • socsa@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah I am honestly taken back at the lack of emotional intelligence in this thread. “HOW DARE YOU NOT UNDERSTAND MY SPECIFIC BRAND OF MISANTHROPE.” Jesus Christ this is some shit most children learn. A gift exchange is a ritual. Complete the fucking ritual you fucking loser. If someone giving you a fucking gift somehow offends you then deal with it later. Yes, even if you are a vegan receiving Wagyu. A person of even moderate emotional intelligence would laugh about it. “Lmao, you aren’t going to believe this…”

          This is pure misattribution fallacy in the most neckbeard way possible.

  • Strider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Are you neurodivergent? If, then it seems like a clear and typical misunderstanding of expectations.

    If not, consider if you might be 😉

  • Mesophar@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    We literally established a rule early in our marriage. I’m not allowed to gift nerdy t shirts. They don’t like them. I love them. I thought they would like them but they do not. So they asked me to stop. This feels the same.

    This point stood out to me. I’m assuming that you verbally established a “no nerdy t-shirts” rule, but did not verbally establish the “no new items” rule. If it was only implied, or you felt it was obvious to not buy you new gifts, but did not explicitly establish that rule like you did for the t-shirts, then it is not the same. Neither of you are bad or wrong for the moscommunication, but this is a great opportunity to have an open and frank discussion about gift expectations for each other.

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Why should they get to be upset about it because it’s a gift, yet the item being replaced with not something similar in style but different, but a literally new version of beloved gift, is supposed to be discarded without any thought about that gift.

      Like what the hell is that logic. That gift you love and use all the time without ever mentioning a problem with is not good enough for my liking, replace it with MY version of it or you will hurt my feelings and that majes YOU a bad person for my feelings getting hurt.

      Sorry but f that logic say I’m sorry I didnt know it meant so much to you.

      They should be made to answer, in front of the mother in law, why and how the perfectly loved and valued watch needed to be replaced

      • Mesophar@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Do you care about the person that gave the gift? Do you trust and believe that they love you and got the gift in good faith, trying to do well even if it was flawed? Then express gratitude for the intention, even if you don’t want the gift. “Sorry, I’m happy with the one I have and don’t want to replace it.”

        Do you care about the person you want to give a gift to? Do you trust and believe that they love you and them disliking a gift isn’t an indicator that they dislike you? Then humbly accept that your gift wasn’t the right one, and work together with them to find something they would prefer instead.

        It isn’t difficult if you just talk with each other. Sometimes people pick bad gifts. Sometimes people are sentimentally attached to items. Sometimes people are very practical and have a “if it isn’t broken, it doesn’t need to be replaced/fixed” mentality that supercedes other considerations. Me, I have the opposite extreme. Even if a gift I receive is nothing something I have any intention of using, I feel obligated to find a space and use for it as a show of appreciation to the person that gifted it to me, because I wasnt owed the gift in the first place and I have gratitude they were thinking of me. That can be (is) unhealthy in an entirely different way.

        But even if you think a gift is dumb and wrong and it’s an insult that they even gave it to you, if you love that person you swallow that pride and let them know you appreciate what they were trying to do but that they got it wrong this time. This can be done gently instead of coldly. And I am not saying OP had done it coldly, maybe the gift giving partner has insecurities they need to deal with. I don’t know, I wasn’t there. Understanding why the gift giving partner would be upset that their gift was snubbed only takes a hint of empathy to understand, though. On the other hand, it’s also easy to understand why the receiver would be confused why the gift was chosen in the first place, with the information provided. Both are missreading each other on different points.

        • Jarix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Do you care about the person that gave the gift? Do you trust and believe that they love you and got the gift in good faith, trying to do well even if it was flawed? Then express gratitude for the intention, even if you don’t want the gift. “Sorry, I’m happy with the one I have and don’t want to replace it.”

          Yes that’s why there is a problem with the reaction wanting to return the gift. Maybe we didn’t understand the same thing.

          The giver was hurt because the reciever expressed that they didn’t want the gift so they should return it because it won’t get used. “Sorry, I’m happy with the one I have and don’t want to replace it.” There is no indication that how you phrased this isn’t exactly what op did. Unlikely, but we don’t know any more than after expressing they don’t want a new version that they suggested it be returned. To me that says I’m sorry but this was a waste and I don’t want your effort to be wasted.

          If this was an acquaintance and not their partner I could see it differently, maybe. I’m trying not to make assumptions about anything here and using the post on its own merit. So as far as I’m concerned OP didn’t do anything wrong and is confused by the hurt reaction. Coming here to try and get an outside perspective is an attempt to get a less biased perspective on the situation which is evidence that OP actually cares a great deal about why this is a problem and is literally asking us to help understand.

          A lot of the comments have made wild assumptions about OP “scolding” their spouse when that’s not information we know and it is being assumed.

  • ToiletFlushShowerScream@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 days ago

    Remember, gifting is a shared experience, meant to be appreciated by the giftee as well as the gifter. It’s obvious that your partner put thought into the gift, and that should be appreciated. Giving thoughtful gifts is not an easy task. Just because you have a new item does not diminish the value of the old sentimental one. But demanding the new one be returned could easily sow resentment in your relationship that will be revisited every gifting season.

    • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I… Sort of agree and sort of disagree. They thought of OP, but also… Didn’t. OP is being stubborn in understanding, but so is the gift giver. It’s a sensitive and complex situation, and both parties’ emotions are valid and just a little bit selfish.

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      they didn’t put any good damned thought into it. Not any that wasn’t completely selfish.